A post dedicated to a special someone

(10/01/2008 09:53:00 PM)

Things have come to such a point when the marginal utility of this post outweighs the marginal benefit of 15 mins of study (such bad HCI students!)


Dear anon, you sure have an unnatural obsession with our class even though you supposedly claim that we are geeks. Following the English proverb “birds of a feather flock together”, this indicates that you are a geek too, creating a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

It is tiring to see posts relating to the ability to suck and debating the quality of geek. You may claim otherwise, but until you personally see us and let us know your true identity, I must say that this is simply an act of cowardice by emotional extremists. 

(Afterall we should follow the best practice of The Straits Times, where readers are required to give their identity before posting opinions)

I dedicate my remaining time to prove a statement generally, within what we know:

Let P(n) be the proposition that the identity known as "anon" is illogical/irrational and is only capable of making n invalid arguments.

LHS of P(1) = "this class sucks"

RHS of P(1) = Baseless assumption without fact. Assumes that we spend our time sucking drinks all the time.

Assume that P(k) is true for some k in the set of incidents we have today

We want to show that P(k+1) is true, ie P(k) proves that"anon"  is capable of making k+1 invalid arguments.  

Using data we have so far, ie P(2)

LHS of P(2) = "geeks"

RHS of P(2) = Argument from ignorance + Baseless assumption. Argument is true cause no one bothers to argue against it. Also, from Answers.com, it assumes that among other things, we are "carnival performers whose show consists of bizarre acts, such as biting the head off a live chicken." (I leave the reader to judge the merit of this

Therefore, since P(1) is true and P(1) is true implies that P(2) is true, by experiment, you are rather illogical from P(2) and P(1). Sure, you may say that this "proves" P(2), but I beg to differ.This is called creativity, unlike you whom just applies the same old boring repertoire of cliches., whom cannot support his/her comments and thus hides under the veil of  anon. 


PS: What sort of pseudonym is that? You need better branding, just like V in V for Vendetta. Anon totally lacks standing. I advise the pseudonym C, so that you can make a new movie!

Name: C for Cowardice!

Plot Summary: An extremist aims to blow up the 08S6H tagboard with strings of meaningless cliches. Watch as various characters, each with their own agenda, scheme and plot againstC for control of the tagboard with their own repartees, as the word anon is hijacked for sinister purposes...



by Indeterminate